随笔南洋网



 
标题: 新加坡第一家庭分裂 李显龙妹妹写公开信
力山谷
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 414
精华 0
积分 709
帖子 333
威望 375 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2006-12-11
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:50  资料 文集 短消息 
新加坡第一家庭分裂 李显龙妹妹写公开信

李光耀的女儿李伟玲和二儿子李显扬今天凌晨在facebook发表长达6页的声明,题为“What has happened to Lee Kuan Yew’s values?” 。文章中声称“我们”对哥哥,也就是现任新加坡总理李显龙失去了信心。原文如下:

What has happened to Lee Kuan Yew’s values?

We feel extremely sad that we are pushed to this position. We are disturbed by thecharacter, conduct, motives and leadership of our brother, Lee Hsien Loong,

Singapore’s current prime minister and the role of his wife, Ho Ching. We have seena completely different face to our brother, one that deeply troubles us. Since thepassing of Lee Kuan Yew, on 23 March 2015, we have felt threatened by Hsien Loong’s misuse of his position and influence over the Singapore government and its agencies to drive his personal agenda. We are concerned that the system has few checks and balances to prevent the abuse of government.

We feel big brother omnipresent. We fear the use of the organs of state against us and Hsien Yang’s wife, Suet Fern. The situation is such that Hsien Yang feels compelled to leave Singapore:

“It is with a very heavy heart that I will leave Singapore for the foreseeable future. This is the country that my father, Lee Kuan Yew, loved and built. It has been home for my entire life. Singapore is and remains my country. I have no desire to leave. Hsien Loong is the only reason for my departure.”

If Hsien Loong is prepared to act thus against us, his younger sister and brother, both contributing members of Singapore’s establishment, to advance his personal agenda, we worry for Singapore. We question whether able leaders with independent political legitimacy will be side-lined to ensure Hsien Loong’s grip on power remains unchallenged.

This is by no means a criticism of the Government of Singapore. We see many upright leaders of quality and integrity throughout the public service, but they are constrained by Hsien Loong’s misuse of power at the very top. We do not trust Hsien Loong and have lost confidence in him.

Since Lee Kuan Yew’s death, there have been changes in Singapore that do not reflect what he stood for. Nobody ever doubted that Lee Kuan Yew always held the best interests of Singapore and Singaporeans at heart. He was authentic and spoke his mind. The same cannot be said for our brother, Lee Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching. We believe, unfortunately, that Hsien Loong is driven by a desire for power and personal popularity. His popularity is inextricably linked to Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy. His political power is drawn from his being Lee Kuan Yew’s son. We have observed that Hsien Loong and Ho Ching want to milk Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy for their own political purposes. We also believe, based on our interactions, that they harbour political ambitions for their son, Li Hongyi.

Singapore has no such thing as the wife of the prime minister being a ‘first lady’. Lee Kuan Yew was Prime Minister from 1959 to 1990. During those many years, his wife (our mother) consistently avoided the limelight, remaining his stalwart supporter and advisor in private. She lived discreetly, and set a high bar for the conduct of a prime minister’s wife. She would never instruct Permanent Secretaries or senior civil servants. The contrast between her and Ho Ching could not be more stark. While Ho Ching holds no elected or official position in government, her influence is pervasive, and extends well beyond her job purview.

Throughout his entire life, Lee Kuan Yew’s sole focus was on Singapore and its future. He was a strong opponent of monuments, particularly of himself. On suggestions that monuments or ‘what-have-yous’ be made for him, he replied “Remember Ozymandias”. He was referring to Percy B Shelley’s sonnet about the Egyptian Pharaoh with a penchant for self-aggrandising monuments. The boast etched in a plaque below his statue commanded lesser mortals to “look on my works”. Only the vastness of desert sands remains: no empire, nor monuments, no great works. Lee Kuan Yew wanted none of these honours as edifices. Much more important to him was that what he had done should last.

It is for this reason that Lee Kuan Yew made clear throughout the years in public and private his wish that his home at 38 Oxley Road be demolished upon his passing. In his last Will and Testament of 17 December 2013, he again reiterated his wish and directed his three children to ensure that it be fulfilled. Indeed, his opposition to monuments was so strong that he had made clear that even if the house were gazetted (against his wishes), it should only be open to his children and their descendants.

However, we believe that Hsien Loong and Ho Ching are motivated by a desire to inherit Lee Kuan Yew’s standing and reputation for themselves and their children.

Whilst our father built this nation upon meritocracy, Hsien Loong, whilst purporting to espouse these values, has spoken of a “natural aristocracy”. Hsien Loong and his wife, Ho Ching, have opposed Lee Kuan Yew’s wish to demolish his house, even when Lee Kuan Yew was alive. Indeed, Hsien Loong and Ho Ching expressed plans to move with their family into the house as soon as possible after Lee Kuan Yew’s passing. This move would have strengthened Hsien Loong’s inherited mandate for himself and his family. Moreover, even if Hsien Loong did not live at 38 Oxley Road, the preservation of the house would enhance his political capital.

What has been distressing are the lengths to which Hsien Loong and Ho Ching have gone and are willing to go to get what they want.

On Hsien Loong’s insistence, Lee Kuan Yew met with the Singapore Cabinet on 21 July 2011 to discuss the fate of his personal home. Wei Ling met Lee Kuan Yew on the steps of their home as he returned from that meeting. He was anguished anddespondent and told Wei Ling “I should not have listened to Loong and gone to meet Cabinet.” He was pained that Hsien Loong, his own son, opposed his wishes in this manner.

Lee Kuan Yew believed that Hsien Loong and Ho Ching were behind what was represented to the family as a government initiative to preserve the house. In due

course, Hsien Loong himself made his position clear to Lee Kuan Yew. On 3 October 2011, Lee Kuan Yew wrote: “Loong as PM has indicated that he will declare it a heritage site.”

Lee Kuan Yew specifically inserted into his will his wish for 38 Oxley Road to be demolished so as to make it difficult for Hsien Loong to misuse the Cabinet to preserve it. He also removed Hsien Loong as an executor and trustee of his will.

The wish, which was instructed to be made public as needed, was Lee Kuan Yew’s direct appeal to the people of Singapore. It was his only request of them on his passing.

At the reading of Lee Kuan Yew’s will, Hsien Loong was very angry that the will gave Wei Ling the right to remain living in the house and that it made clear Lee Kuan Yew’s wish for its demolition immediately upon her passing or relocation. Hsien Loong threatened us and demanded our silence on our father’s last wish. He wanted to assert in Parliament that Lee Kuan Yew had changed his mind, hoping to inherit the faith Singaporeans had in Lee Kuan Yew through the visible symbol of the

house. We refused and fought to release our father’s wish to demolish the house as instructed. We succeeded in making Lee Kuan Yew’s wish public in Singapore only after the international press carried the news. Hsien Loong was therefore forced to state in Parliament that, as a son, he would like to see the wish carried out. He wanted to appear filial in public whilst acting to thwart our parents’ wishes in private.

However, Hsien Loong and Ho Ching did not abandon their plans. Hsien Loong took steps to try to frustrate our publicising Lee Kuan Yew’s wish. We executed a Deed of Gift in 2015 with the National Heritage Board for the donation and public exhibition of significant items from our parents’ home, with a stipulation that Lee Kuan Yew’s wish for the demolition of 38 Oxley Road be displayed prominently at the exhibition.

However, after the gift’s acceptance we soon received letters with spurious objections from Hsien Loong’s then personal lawyer, Lucien Wong. Lucien Wong was made Singapore’s Attorney-General in January 2017. We were shocked to see that Hsien Loong had used his position as Prime Minister to obtain a copy of the Deed of Gift from Minister Lawrence Wong, which Hsien Loong then passed to his personal lawyer to advance his personal agenda. The exhibition only proceeded months later in a diminished format after considerable struggle on our part.
顶部
力山谷
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 414
精华 0
积分 709
帖子 333
威望 375 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2006-12-11
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:50  资料 文集 短消息 
In 2015, various letters were sent by Hsien Loong’s then personal lawyer making accusations and misrepresentations on his behalf regarding the circumstances under which Lee Kuan Yew’s last will was executed and the inclusion of the demolition wish. These were refuted in detail by us through our lawyers. Hsien Loong knew that he could not establish his accusations in a court of law and raised no legal challenge. On the contrary, he was likely concerned that the fact that the gift of the house to him had been obtained by him through misrepresentations to our father and the family might be made public. Probate was granted on 6 October 2015 and Lee Kuan Yew’s will, including the wish to demolish 38 Oxley Road, became the full,  final, and legally binding word on his intentions as to his estate.

Hsien Loong initiated a settlement with us in May 2015; the Estate of Lee Kuan Yew was contemplating a challenge of the disposition of the house to him based on his misrepresentations. Hsien Loong represented that this sale of the house would give us a free hand to demolish the house. Final agreement on the settlement was reached in late 2015. Hsien Loong insisted that Hsien Yang should pay him full market value for the house (and donate an additional half the value of the house to charity). In exchange for this, we asked for and obtained a joint public statement issued by all 3 children of Lee Kuan Yew in December 2015 that we hoped that the Government would allow the demolition wish to be fulfilled and that all Singaporeans would support this cause. We also obtained an undertaking from Hsien Loong that he would recuse himself from all government decisions involving 38 Oxley Road and that, in his personal capacity, would like to see the wish honoured.

We had hoped that through this settlement, he would not hinder us from honouring our parents’ wishes. However, we were disappointed that despite the settlement and Hsien Loong’s undertakings, in July 2016, Minister Lawrence Wong wrote to inform us that a Ministerial Committee had been set up to consider options with respect to 38 Oxley Road and their implications. This also directly contradicted Hsien Loong’s statement in Parliament in April 2015 that there was no need for the Government to take a decision in respect of 38 Oxley Road until Wei Ling no longer resided there, and that it would be up to the Government of the day to consider the matter. Hsien Loong, despite his undertakings to recuse himself, proceeded to make extensive representations to the Committee. He is conflicted. His political power is related to being Lee Kuan Yew’s son and thus he has every incentive to preserve Lee Kuan Yew’s house to inherit his credibility. He also sits in a direct position of power over the Committee comprised of his subordinate ministers, thus wielding considerable influence for any outcome he desires.

Hsien Loong has asserted to the Committee that Lee Kuan Yew would “accept any decision by the Government to preserve 38 Oxley Road.” This play on words is not only dishonest, but nonsensical. Lee Kuan Yew accepted, as he had to, that the Government had the power to preserve 38 Oxley Road against his wishes. But this does not mean that he wanted 38 Oxley Road preserved.

In doing this, Hsien Loong has deliberately misrepresented Lee Kuan Yew’s clear intentions for his own political benefit. He has also gone back on his own declarations that he would recuse himself from all Government decisions involving 38 Oxley Road and his supposed support for the demolition of the house as Lee Kuan Yew’s son.

In his representations to the Committee, Hsien Loong seeks to call into question the circumstances which led to the execution of Lee Kuan Yew’s last will and its inclusion of the demolition wish. He and Ho Ching are unhappy because the demolition wish gives Wei Ling an unfettered right to live in the house. These queries he raised to the Committee were already fully refuted in 2015. Except this time, of course, they are being raised to a Committee comprising Hsien Loong’s subordinates.

The reality is that there was nothing suspicious or untoward at all about the execution of Lee Kuan Yew’s last will. Indeed, Hsien Loong chose not to raise any legal challenge. The simple truth is that Hsien Loong’s current popularity is tied to Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy. Preserving Lee Kuan Yew’s house would allow Hsien Loong and his family to inherit a tangible monument to Lee Kuan Yew’s authority.

Lee Kuan Yew was a lawyer and well knew the sanctity and finality of a will. He gave clear instructions for the execution of the will. He carefully read his final will before signing it, and he continued to review and reflect after signing to put his affairs in order. Two weeks after executing his will, Lee Kuan Yew personally drafted unassisted a codicil to his will and executed it. All three children were kept fully apprised of the signing of the final will and the codicil. No objection was raised at that time and indeed Hsien Loong has affirmed the will in public and in private.

Ultimately, it is not difficult to see that 38 Oxley Road should be demolished. There is full alignment between Lee Kuan Yew’s final wish and the people of Singapore, since there is overwhelming support among Singaporeans for the demolition of the house.

An independent YouGov survey published on 22 December 2015 showed that 77% of Singaporeans supported the demolition of Lee Kuan Yew’s house and only 17% opposed it.

“We are private citizens with no political ambitions. We have nothing to gain from the demolition of 38 Oxley Road, other than the knowledge that we have honoured our father’s last wish. Hsien Loong has everything to gain from preserving 38 Oxley Road – he need only ignore his father’s will and values.”

“The values of Lee Kuan Yew are being eroded by his own son. Our father placed our country and his people first, not his personal popularity or private agendas. We are very sad that we have been pushed to this. We feel hugely uncomfortable and closely monitored in our own country. We do not trust Hsien Loong as a brother or as a leader. We have lost confidence in him.”

Lee Wei Ling and Lee Hsien Yang

Joint Executors and Trustees of the Estate of Lee Kuan Yew

14 June 2017

https://www.facebook.com/38OxleyRoad/

https://www.facebook.com/LeeHsienYangSGP/
顶部
力山谷
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 414
精华 0
积分 709
帖子 333
威望 375 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2006-12-11
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:54  资料 文集 短消息 
新加坡第一家庭分裂,李显龙被妹妹公开批评“神化李光耀”

澎湃新闻记者 任丹妮
2016-04-13 13:02 来源:澎湃新闻

在新加坡前领导人李光耀生前的最后几年,他不断被问到一个问题:你走之后,新加坡会怎样?但他大概想不到,仅仅在他离世一年后,一对儿女为另一个问题——“如何纪念他”——而在Facebook上“大打出手”,冲突走向白热化。在这背后,同样折射出新加坡政局眼下面临的困境以及未来走向的不确定性。

据新加坡《联合早报》报道,身为医生的李光耀之女李玮玲4月10日在社交媒体Facebook上毫不留情面地指责其兄长、现任新加坡总理李显龙“为建立王朝”而“滥用权力”。她公开反对哥哥为纪念李光耀逝世一周年而大肆举办纪念活动,称此举不过是借李光耀“来谋求自己的政治资本”。

“可以说,这也算是一种来自妹妹的警告。威权政治文化的时代已经过去了,李玮玲应该也想警告哥哥,不要再玩逆潮流的一套。”中国暨南大学东南亚研究所副所长庄礼伟告诉澎湃新闻(www.thepaper.cn),李显龙面对的是一个执政党环境不稳固、威望不足的局面,“因此他也不得不打’李光耀’牌来迎合民众,但这样往往会出现用力过猛的现象。”

斥之“不孝子”

新加坡“第一家庭”的内部分歧大白于天下,实属罕见。

据《联合早报》报道,在一封于4月10日公开的私人邮件中,李玮玲——一位知名医生及报纸专栏作家——用HL(李显龙英文名字的缩写)称呼其哥哥,并提到自己与他在针对父亲逝世一周年是否举办缅怀活动产生了分歧。

“HL毫无顾虑地滥用了他的权力,选择在李光耀逝世仅满一周年就举办纪念活动。但去年的事大家仍记忆犹新,没有人会在一年内忘记。”她写道。

“如果掌权者欲建立王朝,身为李光耀的女儿,我不会允许他的名誉被一个不孝之子玷污。”李玮玲直言不讳地批评李显龙及其政府是在挖掘父亲的遗产为自己谋求政治资本。

尽管Facebook上的贴文于周日(4月10日)被删(新加坡亚洲新闻网称,并不清楚是谁删除之),但李显龙在数小时后同样在Facebook上回应称,“对于妹妹的指责感到伤心”,并驳斥她的指控“完全不属实”。

事实是,李玮玲对纪念一事已抨击了几周时间,但李显龙是首次正面回应,“一个人逝世一周年是纪念和反思的重要时刻,尤其是李光耀逝世一周年更具有意义。”

反对当局“造神”

去年3月23日,新加坡国父李光耀逝世。在很多新加坡人心中,李光耀有着崇高的地位,他的名字可以完全和新加坡划上等号,对于这位该国“前无古人,后无来者”式的政治强人,民众的追悼规模也是“前所未有”的。在其国葬仪式的当日,成千上万的新加坡人在倾盆大雨中沿路挥泪告别这位建国总理。

一年过去,为了纪念其逝世一周年,新加坡当局举办100多场纪念活动,包括追思会、诗歌朗诵、植树和健走等。

在盛大的纪念活动浩浩荡荡开展之际,李玮玲再也坐不住了。3月25日,她在Facebook上发文称,这种“英雄式的膜拜”让她感到“胆寒”,如果父亲仍在世,也绝对会反感这样的大肆折腾。

李玮玲强调父亲生前最反对“个人崇拜”,称这样浩大的“缅怀活动”过犹不及,“任何崇拜行为都有可能起反作用,未来的新加坡人以后在看待父亲时,会认为他一生的功绩是为了名利,或者是想搞出个王朝来。但他矢志不渝的一生只是为了新加坡的发展,不是为了他的名字永载史册或者留下多么宏大的政治遗产。”

事件的进一步发酵还与当地一家知名媒体有关。3月21日,新加坡英文媒体《海峡时报》在其头版上刊登了一幅李光耀的画像,这幅巨大的画像由110个新加坡人用4877块印有新加坡国旗的橡皮拼制而成,高3.1米、宽2.3米,画像下,则是一篇题为《我们的父亲,我们的国家,我们的旗帜》的文章。

李玮玲对这种“造神式”的做法嗤之以鼻,并指责《海峡时报》甘为政府“走狗”,对她的投稿进行审查删改不予刊登。她在25日于Facebook上贴出了投稿的原文。

《海峡时报》副总编辑费尔南德斯(Ivan Fernandez)则回应称其文章涉嫌抄袭,并指出其将新加坡纪念李光耀与英国纪念丘吉尔相比不切题。

震怒之余,李玮玲在4月10日贴出了两人完整的私人沟通邮件。

未来走向的争议

事实上,争议公开化背后折射出的更大问题在于新加坡的未来应该走向何方。

就在李光耀去年辞世后不久,《纽约时报》曾撰文对新加坡的未来提出疑问:当李光耀的影响逐渐退去,在可能更自由的新一代人手中,李所创造的模式会发生怎样的改变?

暨南大学东南亚研究所副所长庄礼伟告诉澎湃新闻,对于李显龙政府而言,后李光耀时代的挑战是明显的。“当前全球情势不乐观,竞争加剧,经济环境不好,中等阶层纷纷往下掉,社会的焦虑感很突出,所以对于李显龙而言,如果还是采取他父亲那一套强力打压异见,而不在经济方面拿出政绩是行不通的。”

美国《华尔街日报》4月11日撰文抨击了2013年以来新加坡当局对言论的管控加剧。文章举例称,就在上个月,一名生活在新加坡的日裔澳大利亚女子高木爱(Ai Takagi)被控在网上发文挑起旅居外国人和新加坡人之间的敌意与仇恨,进而以“煽动罪”被判处10个月监禁。而去年,就在李光耀丧礼后,一名新加坡少年阿莫斯易(Amos Yee)因发布一段名为攻击李光耀的视频而被逮捕,视频中他称“领导者(李光耀)的赤裸裸缺陷被隐藏,因为大多数人不敢批评他”。

文章还批评说,长期以来,新加坡领导人都有“任人唯亲”的问题,喜欢裙带关系。

但女儿李玮玲强调父亲生前“坚决反对个人崇拜和任何任人唯亲的行为”。在1984年的一次采访中,李光耀明确表示反对在新加坡搞个人崇拜的想法,“危险……在于领导人死后,面临寻找下一位领导人(去崇拜)的难题。”他当时说道,并反对任何形式的“造神”——比如以他的名义建立雕塑或纪念碑。

但《联合早报》早前报道,李显龙有为李光耀设建国元勋纪念堂的想法,并称新加坡未来可以考虑在钱币上使用李光耀肖像来纪念他。在纪念钞的设计中,年轻的李光耀高举着拳头喊着“Merdeka!”(独立)。

“远离政治的李玮玲和父亲李光耀走得比较近,晚年父女俩也聊天比较多,所以李玮玲会更知道李光耀的想法,他不喜欢这么做,晚年的李光耀也明白抬得越高摔得也会越重。”庄礼伟分析道,“对于这样一个有着争议的领导人,李玮玲也是‘护父心切’,想要维护爸爸分裂的声誉,避免过度反而引起民众的反感。”

庄礼伟认为,威权政治文化的生存环境“已经一去不复返了”。
顶部
Feng2004
高级会员
Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4



UID 119759
精华 0
积分 2000
帖子 931
威望 996 点
阅读权限 20
注册 2016-8-25
来自 新加坡
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:54  资料 文集 短消息 
修身,齊家,治國,平天下!

敗!
顶部
力山谷
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 414
精华 0
积分 709
帖子 333
威望 375 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2006-12-11
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:55  资料 文集 短消息 
以上是去年的一段旧闻。双方关系走到“决裂”,用那个成语是“冰冻三尺非……”
顶部
地球人在tw
金牌会员
Rank: 5Rank: 5Rank: 5Rank: 5Rank: 5



UID 116144
精华 0
积分 7186
帖子 3538
威望 3611 点
阅读权限 30
注册 2015-2-24
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:59  资料 文集 短消息 
當醫生難道不知自己兄長羅癌不久人世

怎會建立李氏王朝?

除非找自己兒女繼位
顶部
力山谷
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 414
精华 0
积分 709
帖子 333
威望 375 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2006-12-11
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 10:59  资料 文集 短消息 
李显龙否认妹妹“建立王朝”指责

【财新网】(驻新加坡记者 陈立雄)新加坡总理李显龙4月10日否定妹妹李玮玲指他为“建立王朝”举办父亲李光耀逝世一周年追思活动的谴责。

  这次事件始源于李玮玲3月25日在脸书上发表的文章。她在此长文里呼吁外界不要以英雄式崇拜纪念李光耀,并批评《海峡时报》21日头版题为《我们的父亲,我们的国家,我们的旗帜》一文——配图是由100名新加坡青年用印有国旗的橡皮,拼成李光耀肖像。“这张照片带回来1976年我随父亲首次访问中国的回忆。”

  她写道,当时文革刚结束,中方安排大批孩子在街上列队喊“欢迎”,但李光耀并不感动。她比较毛泽东与丘吉尔去世后的纪念形式,并表示若李光耀能够选择,他一定希望自己的纪念与后者类似,且反对新加坡目前的纪念模式。

  新加坡建国总理李光耀有三个子女。现年61岁的李玮玲是长女,上有比她大三岁的哥哥、现任总理李显龙,下有新加坡民航局董事会主席李显扬。李玮玲曾任新加坡国立精神医学院研究院主任,现为该院高级顾问医生,同时也是作家,为《海峡时报》经常撰稿。李玮玲直言不讳,曾透露李光耀说过,“你继承了我的性格。”

  李玮玲近日还与当地主流大报《海峡时报》交锋。4月1日,她表示,不再为这份日报的出版公司新加坡报业控股(SPH)供稿,原因是该集团的编辑不给她言论自由。随后,《海峡时报》言论版发表“主编笔记”对此反驳,编辑稿件不涉及言论自由,而关乎职业水平。她要求毫不修改地刊登她的原文,这“完全无法接受”。

  负责李玮玲专栏的该报编辑4月9日称,她原定于3月27日刊登的一篇专栏,直至25日再收到她送来有大量新增部分的另一版本文章,而发现比较中英领导人的描述中几乎四分之三是抄袭。然而,李玮玲则表示,在与这位编辑的沟通中,抄袭一事从来没有被提到。

  4月10日,李玮玲发布其与《海峡时报》的邮件往来。其中一封邮件里,她透露她与李显龙在“在原则上有所分歧”。她批评现任总理为建立王朝滥用权力举行追思活动,且自己不会允许他父亲名声被“践踏”。“去年(父亲逝世)的事件大家至今印象都还很深刻,没有人会在一年内就忘记。”不过,李玮玲在数小时后拿下了贴文。

  同一天晚间,李显龙在脸书上对此深表难过,并强调这些指控完全不属实。他表示,内阁成员对于如何悼念李光耀经过一番讨论,他当时的建议是相关活动应由民间发起,活动规模不应太大,而且重点是要深讨未来。

  李显龙接着写道,“说我是要建立王朝,这是不合理的指控。任人唯贤是我们社会坚持的基本价值观。我、人民行动党或新加坡人民都不会容忍这样的企图。”
顶部
力山谷
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 414
精华 0
积分 709
帖子 333
威望 375 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2006-12-11
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 11:00  资料 文集 短消息 
李总理对弟弟妹妹公开指控深感难过并予以否认

李显龙总理对弟弟妹妹选择公开家中纠纷,感到十分遗憾与失望。

目前在国外度假的他今早发出简短的声明表示,李玮玲和李显扬对他与何晶的指控让他很难过,他和妻子 何晶全然否认这些指控,特别是关于他要扶持儿子上政坛的指责。

“兄弟姐妹之间可能存在分歧,我认为这些分歧应该是只限在家庭里。自从我父亲在 2015 年3月去世,出于对父母的尊重,身为长子,我尽一切努力处理我们家人之间的纷争。我弟弟妹妹的公开信伤害了父亲的名誉。


我会继续尽我全力无愧于父母,与此同时,也会继续竭尽所能忠诚地为新加坡服务,特别是坚持唯才是用,而这是我们社会的基本价值观。

我的弟弟妹妹们都知道我和家人在国外度假,这个周末回国后我会考虑后续的处理。”

李玮玲和李显扬是李光耀的遗嘱执行人,两人今天凌晨3时同时在各自的面簿上以《李光耀的价值观哪去了?》为题发表联合声明,表示对李总理失去信心,并对新加坡的未来感到担心。他们在六页声明中提到欧思礼路38号的李光耀故居,声称在遵从李光耀遗愿拆除故居的过程中遇到阻挠。李显扬也在声明中表示“会在可预见的将来离开新加坡。”
顶部
德下花园
高级会员
Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4



UID 30777
精华 6
积分 3203
帖子 1350
威望 1834 点
阅读权限 20
注册 2008-9-2
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 11:02  资料 文集 短消息 
第一家庭闹内讧,对新加坡会有何影响?
顶部
德下花园
高级会员
Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4



UID 30777
精华 6
积分 3203
帖子 1350
威望 1834 点
阅读权限 20
注册 2008-9-2
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 11:04  资料 文集 短消息 
小国能经受得了如此的“内斗”吗?

李显龙弟弟妹妹的指责,李显龙的否认,哪一个更可信呢?
顶部
Feng2004
高级会员
Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4



UID 119759
精华 0
积分 2000
帖子 931
威望 996 点
阅读权限 20
注册 2016-8-25
来自 新加坡
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 11:12  资料 文集 短消息 
也該換人了!
顶部
往事一风
注册会员
Rank: 2Rank: 2



UID 100854
精华 0
积分 367
帖子 162
威望 203 点
阅读权限 5
注册 2011-6-28
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 11:25  资料 文集 短消息 
Lee Hsien Loong

I am very disappointed that my siblings have chosen to issue a statement publicising private family matters. I am deeply saddened by the unfortunate allegations that they have made. Ho Ching and I deny these allegations, especially the absurd claim that I have political ambitions for my son.

While siblings may have differences, I believe that any such differences should stay in the family. Since my father’s passing in March 2015, as the eldest son I have tried my best to resolve the issues among us within the family, out of respect for our parents.

My siblings’ statement has hurt our father’s legacy.

I will do my utmost to continue to do right by my parents. At the same time, I will continue serving Singaporeans honestly and to the best of my ability. In particular that means upholding meritocracy, which is a fundamental value of our society.

As my siblings know, I am presently overseas on leave with my family. I will consider this matter further after I return this weekend. - LHL


图片附件: 李显龙回应.jpg (2017-6-14 11:25, 234.73 K)

顶部
super007
高级会员
Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4



UID 114909
精华 1
积分 2847
帖子 1385
威望 1460 点
阅读权限 20
注册 2013-12-17
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 14:42  资料 文集 短消息 
李显龙不是说要交棒了嘛,如果要建立李家王朝,他儿子应该出来竞选了。
顶部
大傻
禁止发言




UID 99958
精华 0
积分 15514
帖子 7616
威望 7828 点
阅读权限 1
注册 2011-6-20
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 15:46  资料 短消息 


QUOTE:
原帖由 德下花园 于 2017-6-14 11:02 发表
第一家庭闹内讧,对新加坡会有何影响?

没有影响!
会有什么影响???

新加坡还是新加坡!
顶部
大傻
禁止发言




UID 99958
精华 0
积分 15514
帖子 7616
威望 7828 点
阅读权限 1
注册 2011-6-20
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 15:52  资料 短消息 


QUOTE:
原帖由 德下花园 于 2017-6-14 11:04 发表
小国能经受得了如此的“内斗”吗?

李显龙弟弟妹妹的指责,李显龙的否认,哪一个更可信呢?

哪一个更可信呢?
信不信都没影响! —— 一间故居要影响什么?
李玮玲与李显扬针对李光耀故居分歧发表联合声明
【李玮玲与李显扬针对李光耀故居分歧发表联合声明】
http://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/singapore/story20170614-771108

双方坚持不下? 法律解决吧!
但有必要吗?
要保留?就保留!
要拆? 就差好了!

http://www.wanbao.com.sg/local/story20150415-52506

[ 本帖最后由 大傻 于 2017-6-14 15:55 编辑 ]
顶部
super007
高级会员
Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4Rank: 4



UID 114909
精华 1
积分 2847
帖子 1385
威望 1460 点
阅读权限 20
注册 2013-12-17
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 15:55  资料 文集 短消息 


QUOTE:
原帖由 大傻 于 2017-6-14 15:46 发表


没有影响!
会有什么影响???

新加坡还是新加坡!

很多外人深信新加坡所有重要职位都由李家人掌握。
顶部
大傻
禁止发言




UID 99958
精华 0
积分 15514
帖子 7616
威望 7828 点
阅读权限 1
注册 2011-6-20
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 16:04  资料 短消息 


QUOTE:
原帖由 super007 于 2017-6-14 14:42 发表
李显龙不是说要交棒了嘛,如果要建立李家王朝,他儿子应该出来竞选了。

【特别是关于他要扶持儿子进入政坛的荒谬指责。】

谁有本事,欢迎都出来竞选!
【坚持唯才是用,而这是我们社会的基本价值观。】
顶部
大傻
禁止发言




UID 99958
精华 0
积分 15514
帖子 7616
威望 7828 点
阅读权限 1
注册 2011-6-20
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 16:08  资料 短消息 


QUOTE:
原帖由 大傻 于 2017-6-14 16:04 发表


【特别是关于他要扶持儿子进入政坛的荒谬指责。】

谁有本事,欢迎都出来竞选!
【坚持唯才是用,而这是我们社会的基本价值观。】

谁有本事,欢迎都出来竞选!
【坚持唯才是用,而这是我们社会的基本价值观。】

管他是谁! 管他又是谁的儿子, 【唯才是用】要来就来吧,欢迎!
顶部
kcchiew
中级会员
Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 3023
精华 0
积分 1186
帖子 590
威望 596 点
阅读权限 10
注册 2007-9-7
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 16:37  资料 文集 短消息 
她就是个“麻烦制造者”。。。

(换是新加坡政治人物,很可能会告她毁谤。)



[ 本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 2017-6-15 17:09 编辑 ]
顶部
五月天
注册会员
Rank: 2Rank: 2



UID 118783
精华 0
积分 169
帖子 84
威望 85 点
阅读权限 5
注册 2016-4-4
状态 离线
发表于 2017-6-14 18:53  资料 文集 短消息 
其实我认为李显龙是有感在李光耀逝世时,一时之间国民感悟到国家和自身的关系,因而李显龙是为了团结国民,顺势持续激起国民对国家产生更强大的向心力。这是新加坡迈向未来必备的重要因素。
顶部
 




当前时区 GMT+8, 现在时间是 2017-6-25 13:10

    本论坛支付平台由支付宝提供
携手打造安全诚信的交易社区 Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0  © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.037819 second(s), 8 queries , Gzip enabled

清除 Cookies - 联系我们 - 随笔南洋网 - Archiver